|
|
Articles from prior issues of The Advocate
May/June, 1998
| Executive Officers Tour The “Hill” To Contact Key Legislators and GAO by Marty Marshall, Legislative Chair ON TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1998, NADE President Debi Gardiner, President-Elect Jeff Price and I visited: Angel Vallillo, Legislative Director of Representative McCrery’s staff; Kim Hildred, Staff Director of the House Sub-Committee on Social Security; Raymond Smietanka, Chief Counsel of the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law; Alexander Vachon, Chief Social Security Analyst, Senate Finance Committee, Subcommittee on Social Security and Family Policy; and the offices of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Representative McCrery
was instrumental in passage of the SSI childhood legislation. Debi, Jeff
and I discussed the Finance Committee Hearing on SSI for Children scheduled
for March 10, 1998. Angel felt strongly that NADE needs to provide testimony
and we agreed to prepare a statement. After conferring with Kim Hildred,
she suggested that we talk with Alexander Vachon. Mr. Vachon was on his
way to another meeting when we stopped by. However, in his words, “I heard
you were here and I couldn’t not see you.” He also asked that we provide
written testimony for the March 10 Hearing. We had originally planned to
see Raymond Smietanka to discuss HR 1544, the Federal Compliance Act. However,
on Friday (February 27), we had learned from Webb Phillips, Social Security
legislative Representative, that the bill had already passed the House.
Consequently, our visit to the House Judiciary Committee was essentially
to touch base and discuss the status of the Senate companion bill. Mr.
Smietanka was very pleasant but did not seem entirely sure of where this
bill stood in the Senate. We did learn from the staff at the Senate Judiciary
Committee that the bill (S1166) was still in Committee. On Wednesday, while
attending the Childhood Training, we spoke with Bill Hutchinson and Cindy
Bascetta from the General Accounting Office, discussing their study which
showed inconsistencies in the childhood mental retardation listings and
also discussing the two hearings scheduled for the following week. |
|
|